Majority of Voters Back National Sales Tax, IRS Abolishment Looms!

Clearwater, Florida, USA - A national conversation is brewing around the future of the federal tax system, with a growing movement pushing for a dramatic overhaul. Recent insights reveal that a considerable number of voters are rallying behind the idea of replacing the income tax with a national sales tax. A survey conducted by Quantus Insights shows that bipartisan support exists for this significant reform, with 69% of Republicans, 52% of Democrats, and 51% of Independents backing a shift to a consumption-based tax.West Orlando News reports that 50% of voters expressed support for the elimination of the IRS, a revelation that indicates a palpable desire for change.

According to the survey, conducted from May 30 to June 5, 2025, 58% of respondents favor a national consumption tax that enables workers to keep 100% of their paychecks. This proposal is rooted in the FAIRtax plan (H.R. 25), which aims to repeal various forms of taxation including income, payroll, and corporate taxes. An intriguing aspect of this plan is its appeal among younger voters; 60% of those under 30 support abolishing the IRS. Interestingly, working-class voters who lack college degrees show a robust inclination towards tax reform, reflecting a desire for an equitable tax structure that doesn’t penalize hard work.

Concerns and Confusions

While the enthusiasm for tax overhaul is evident, concerns lurk beneath the surface. Many older Americans, women, Democrats, and those with postgraduate degrees voice worries about fairness and affordability. A common fear is that a national sales tax might lead to price hikes or disproportionately burden low-income households, despite the FAIRtax plan proposing a monthly rebate to alleviate potential hardships. The proposal’s complexity seems to stoke confusion—only about 25% of voters had prior knowledge of the FAIRtax prior to the survey, with increased awareness observed among middle-aged and Black voters.

This backdrop of uncertainty parallels a Republican proposal aiming to ensure the wealthy pay their fair share while allowing certain families to spend a tax-free amount of $30,000. However, a significant 64% of voters reported hearing little to nothing about this legislative effort, signaling a disconnect that GOP lawmakers must bridge.Morning Consult highlights that preferences for a revised tax system are mixed; while 52% support a progressive tax based on income levels, only 26% lean toward a plan that mirrors the FAIRtax approach.

What Lies Ahead?

The FAIRtax plan suggests a sales tax rate of 23%, although some estimates hint that the effective rate might creep up to 30% for consumers. Its champions argue that it could provide a simpler tax framework while reducing the administrative burden of the IRS, proposing to outsource tax collection to state governments. Speaker Kevin McCarthy has indicated that a House floor vote on the FAIRtax plan could materialize, marking a potential milestone for this long-debated issue that has made appearances in Congress since 1999.Tax Foundation provides details on how the FAIRtax would apply to around 90% of all consumption, theoretically covering about 61% of GDP.

Moreover, the plan embraces a “family consumption allowance” to provide rebates aimed at households up to the poverty level, ensuring that low-income families would be shielded from its full effects. Yet, critics caution that transitioning to this system could lead to double taxation for those already burdened by existing income taxes on their savings. Concerns persist about whether the FAIRtax would genuinely uphold fairness or inadvertently increase the tax burden on lower-income Americans who often live paycheck to paycheck.

As discussions unfold and public sentiment shifts, the outcome of these proposals remains uncertain. Voter preferences indicate a readiness for change, but it will take significant education and clarification for these ideas to gain traction. The question that lingers is whether the FAIRtax model can truly deliver on its promises without leaving vulnerable populations behind.